The Influence Of Work Environment And Individual Characteristics On Employee Performance At Pt. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura

(1) * Intihan Intihan Mail (Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia)
(2) Defi Triansyah Mail (Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia)
(3) Evita Sari Mail (Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia)
(4) Leo Tarnando Mail (Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia)
(5) Tyara Anggelya Putri Mail (Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


This This research was carried out at PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura. The formulation of the research problem is 1) Does the work environment influence the performance of PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura? 2) Do individual characteristics influence PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura? 3) Do the environment and individual characteristics influence the performance of PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura. The objectives of this research are 1) To determine the influence of the work environment on employee performance at PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura. 2) To determine the influence of individual characteristics on employee performance at PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura. 3) To determine the influence of the work environment and individual characteristics on employee performance at PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura. The population of this research is all employees of PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura as many as 25 people. This research sample used a total sampling method of 25 people. The data analysis used is multiple linear regression analysis, Determinant Coefficient, Hypothesis Testing with f-test and t-test. The results of the research are: 1) From the calculation of the multiple linear regression equation, it can be seen that the Work Environment (X1) and Individual Characteristics (X2) influence employee performance at PT. Sarana Bengkulu Ventura. Work environment coefficient (b) = 0.471 means that the work environment has a positive influence on employee performance or in other words, if the work environment increases 1 time, it will be followed by an increase in employee performance of 0.471. Individual characteristics coefficient (b) = 0.336 means that individual characteristics have a positive influence on employee performance or in other words, if individual characteristics increase 1 time, this will be followed by an increase in employee performance of 0.336. 2) The determinant coefficient (R2) value was 0.658. This value means that the work environment and individual characteristics contribute to employee performance by 0.658 or 65.8% and the remaining 34.2% is not studied in this research. 3) With the f-test, the hypothesis can also be proven to be true, where the work environment variables (X1) and individual characteristics (X2) show a p-value = 0.00 < 0.05 so that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. With the t test, the hypothesis was also proven to be true, where the work environment variable showed a calculated t value = 2.478 > t table 2.060 so it was concluded that Ha was accepted. The individual characteristic variable shows the calculated t value = 2.680 > t table 2.060 so it can be concluded that Ha is accepted.


Keywords


Work Environment, Individual Characteristics, Employee Performance.

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v5i1.223
      

Article metrics

10.47679/jrssh.v5i1.223 Abstract views : 10

   

Cite

   

References


Alex. S Nitisemito. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta

Anorogo, Widiyanti. 2007. Manajemen Bisnis, PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta

Armstrong, M. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Media Kompetindo, Jakarta

Bambang Wahyudi. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Sulita, Bandung

Dessler, Gary. 2007 . Manajemen Personalia. Terjemahan. Erlangga, Jakarta

rida, Syafarudin Alwi. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Erlangga, Jakarta

Karmisa. 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Sulita, Bandung

Kreitner, Robert dan Kinicki, Angelo. 2007. Perilaku Organisasi, Salemba Empat, Jakarta

Mathis, R. L., dan J.H. Jackson. 2007, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Terjemahan, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Mathiue dan Zajac. 2008. A Review and Meta Analysisof the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organisational Commitment, Psychological Bulletin, New York

Mowday, R. T. 2008. Employee Organisational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover, Academic Press, New York

Prawiro Sentono. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Media Kompetindo, Jakarta

Prayitno, 2008. Model Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Rivai Veithzal. 2008. Performance Appraisal Sistem Yang Tepat Untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Robbins, Stephen, P. 2007. Perilaku Organisai, Erlangga, Jakarta

Schultz. 2006. Psikologi Pertumbuhan, Model-model Kepribadian Sehat, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta

Sedarmayati. 2009. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Mandar Maju, Bandung

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Alfabeta, Bandung

Suryadi Perwiro S. 2001. Model Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia, Asia dan Timur Jauh, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

T. Hani Handoko. 2007. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia, BPFE, Yogjakarta


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Intihan Intihan, Defi Triansyah, Evita Sari, Leo Tarnando, Tyara Anggelya Putri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Journal of Research in Social Science And Humanities

Published by Utan Kayu Publishing

Lucky Arya Residence 2 No. 18
Jalan HOS. Cokroaminoto Kab. Pringsewu
Lampung - Indonesia, Postal code 35373

Email: jurnal.jrssh@gmail.com