Interrogating the Community Participation Paradigm: A theoretical Perspective

(1) * Jephias Mapuva Mail (Tugwi Mukosi Multidisciplinary Research Institute (TMMRI) Midlands State University Zvishavane Campus Zvishavane-ZIMBABWE, Zimbabwe)
*corresponding author

Abstract


Community participation in governance processes has been viewed as enhancing a democratic culture within concerned communities by making participants part of the problem-solving mechanism. Proponents of community participation espouse divergent views but concur that positive attributes are realised. In South Africa the post-1994 democratic dispensation has created an enabling environment for community participation at different levels of government. This has been necessitated in part to the participatory approach the communities undertook to dislodge the apartheid regime. In South Africa, through appropriate constitutional provisions, communities have been empowered to have a stake in the running of their own affairs through elected councillors and municipal officials. With community participation, people have felt to be part of a solution to problems in their communities and this has helped to eliminate poverty through the engagement of private sector to provide services which cannot be efficiently delivered by government. Lack of interest in municipal affairs has also resulted in non-participation by some communities.


Keywords


Community participation; tokenism; paradigm; decision-making; policy-formulation; continuum.

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v5i1.163
      

Article metrics

10.47679/jrssh.v5i1.163 Abstract views : 56 | PDF views : 20

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Adato,M., Hoddinott,J., Haddad,L. (2005) Power, Politics and Performance: Community participation in South African Public Works Programs. Research Report No.143.International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, D.C

Advocates for Youth. Unpublished data from the Burkina Project. Washington, DC: 2001

Bhatnagar B et al. Participatory Development and the World Bank. [World Bank Discussion Paper] Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1992.

Dahl,R (1994). Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation. Political Science Quarterly 109(1).23-24

Faguet,J.P. (2007).Can Local Government Work for the Poor? IFPRI Forum, March 2007.

Fair Share,(2007). “Budget Advocacy and Monitoring” in Partnership in Action, June 2007.UWC.Bellville

Fischer (2000).Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge.Durham,London

Fung, A. and Wright, E. O. (2001), “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance”, Politics and Society 29 (1): 5-41.

Grote, Juergen, and Bernard Gbikpi. 2002. Participatory Governance:Political and Societal Implications. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

Henry Teune & Frank Plantan, Jr (2001). General Report: United States Study

Universities as Sites of Citizenship and Civic Responsibility

Howard-Grabman L, Snetro G. How to Mobilize Communities for Health and Social Change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs, forthcoming.

MacQueen KM et al. What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Pub Health 2001; 91:1929-1938.

Mohan, G. and Stokke K. (2000), “Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism”, Third World Quarterly 21 (2): 247-268.

National Institutes of Health, Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, [1995?].

Oyugi, W.O. (2000), “Decentralisation for good governance and development: Concepts and Issues.” Regional Development Dialogue 21 (1): iii-xix, ;3-25.

Republic of S.A.1996 (a). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996, Chapter 10, section 1, subsection (e) Republic of South Africa (2000) Local Government Municipal Systems Act, No 32 of 2000, Pretoria: Government printers

Robinson, M. (1998) ‘Democracy, participation and public policy’, The Democratic developmental State, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Sabatier, Paul A. 1991. Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process, PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (2):147-157.

Schmitter, Philippe C. 2002. Participation in Governance Arrangements. Edited by J. R. G. Grote, B., Participatory Governance. Opladen.

Schönwälder, G. (1997), “New Democratic Spaces at the Grassroots? Popular

participation in Latin American Local Governments”. Development and Change 28(4):753-770.

Transitions, volume 14, no. 1, October 2001 www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/transitions/transitions1401.htm.

UNESCAP, (2006).Access to basic services for the poor: the importance of good governance. http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/access-to-basic-services.asp

Williams, J. J (2006.Community Development Workers as advocacy planners in South Africa: A Bourdieuan approach, Occasional paper No.5.Project: Policy Management, Governance and Poverty Alleviation in the Western Cape. DBBS, UWC. Bellville

Williams, J. J (2006). Community Participation: Lessons from post-apartheid South Africa. Policy Studies, Vol. 27, No 3, 2006.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jephias Mapuva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Journal of Research in Social Science And Humanities

Published by Utan Kayu Publishing

Lucky Arya Residence 2 No. 18
Jalan HOS. Cokroaminoto Kab. Pringsewu
Lampung - Indonesia, Postal code 35373

Email: jurnal.jrssh@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
JRSSH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.