(Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia)(2) Kartika Hendra Titisari
(Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia)(3) Dimas Ilham Nur Rois
(Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractAuditors are obliged to examine the information presented in the annual financial report and provide an opinion on the fairness of the financial report, so that the annual financial report can be used as a reliable decision-making tool. Therefore, it is very important to improve the audit quality of financial reports from auditors so that stakeholders can make better decisions. This research aims to test and analyze the effect of audit tenure on audit quality. The data used in this research is secondary data, obtained from annual financial reports. The population and sample in this research are property and reel estate companies listed on the IDX for the 2018-2024 period. The sampling technique for this research uses a purposive sampling technique. The number of samples in this research was 54 companies in the property and reel estate sectors with research sample observations of 77 observations. The analysis technique used to test this research hypothesis is multiple regression with SPSS version 22. The independent variables of this research are audit fees, client size, and audit period. The dependent variable of this research is audit quality. The results of this research indicate that audit fees, client size, and audit period have an influence on audit quality. KeywordsAudit Fees, Client Size, Audit Period, Audit Quality
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v4i2.174 |
Article metrics10.47679/jrssh.v4i2.174 Abstract views : 147 | PDF views : 63 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Ardani., SV (2017). The Effect of Audit Tenure, Audit Rotation, Audit Fee on Audit Quality with Audit as a Moderating Variable (Study of Financial Sector Companies Listed on the IDX 2010-2014. Journal of Accounting, Vol. 6, No. 1, Pages. 1-12.
Choi JH, Kim JB, Liu X, & Simunic DA (2009). Cross-Listing Audit Fee Premiums: Theory and Evidence". The Accounting Review. 84: 1429-1463.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.3 (3). August: p.183-199.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Pp. 113-127.
Fahrunisya, Tria Inggid. 2014. "Analysis of the Effect of Dividend Policy and Company Size on Earnings Management". Journal of the MDP College of Economics. Vol. 1 No. 3. Pg. 1-11.
Fernando, GD, Ahmed M., and Randal JE 2010. Audit quality attributes, client size and cost of equity capital. ?Review of Accounting and Finance. 9(4): p: 363-381.
Ghozali, I. (2016). MULTIVARIATE analysis application with the IBM SPSS 25 edition 9 program. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.
Hoitash, Rani, Ariel Markelevich and Charles A. Barragato. 2007. Audit Fees and Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22, Iss 8, p 761 – 786.
Ittonen, Kim. 2010. A Theoretical Examination of the Role of Audit and the Relevance of Audit Reports. Vaasa University, Vaasa.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. journal of financial economics, vol. 3. p: 305-360.
Kafabih, AS (2017). Analysis of the Influence of Client Size, Audit Firm Size and Audit Fee on Audit Quality. National Journal, Vo. 6, no. 3, Pg. 1-11.
Kurniasih, Margi and Rohman, Abdul. 2014. The Effect of Audit Fees, Audit Tenure, and Audit Rotation on Audit Quality. Dipenogoro University E-Journal. Vol. 3, no. 3: 1-10. ISSN: 2337-3806.
Lee, David and Sukartha, I Made. 2017. Audit Fees as a Moderating Effect of Auditor Switching and Audit Tenure on Audit Quality. Udayana University Accounting E-Journal. Vol. 18, no. 2: 1455-1484. ISSN: 2302-8556.
Lyon & Maher (2005). The Importance of Business Risk in Audit Fee Determination: Evidence from Client Negligence Cases. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 43, No. 1: pp. 133-151.
Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Nugroho, Lucky. 2018. Analysis of Factors Affecting Audit Quality of MercuBuana University Maneksi Journal. Vol 7, No. 1: 55-65. ISSN: 2597-4599.
O'Brien, P. and R. Bhushan. 1990. "Analyst Following And Institutional Ownership". Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Supplement). Pages: 55-82.
Pertiwi, Nastia Putri, Amir Hasan and Hardi. 2016. The Influence of Audit Engagement Period, KAP Industry Specialization, KAP Reputation and Audit Committee on Audit Quality (Empirical Study of Manufacturing Companies on the IDX 2011-2014). Riau University Accounting Journal. Vol. 4, no. 2: 147-160. ISSN: 2337-4314.
Pramaswaradana, I Gusti NI, and Astika, Ida BP 2017. "The Effect of Audit Tenure, Audit Fees, Auditor Rotation, Auditor Specialization, and Age of Publication on Audit Quality." Udayana University Accounting E-Journal. Vol 19.1, p. 168- 194.
Sari, ea (2019). The Influence of Audit Tenure, Audit Rotation, Audit Fees, Accounting Firm Size and Auditor Specialization on Audit Quality. Indonesian Accounting and Finance Research Journal, Vol. 4, no. 3.
Sinaga, David. (2012). "Analysis of the Effect of Audit Tenure, KAP Size and Client Company Size on Audit Quality". Diponegoro University Semarang publication journal.
Watkins, A. W. (2004). Audit Quality: Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, N0.23, pp: 153-193.
Yuniarti, R. (2011). Audit firm size, audit fees and audit quality. Global Management, 2.(1). p.84-97.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Prima Wijaya, Kartika Hendra Titisari, Dimas Ilham Nur Rois
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal of Research in Social Science And Humanities
Published by Utan Kayu Publishing
Email: jurnal.jrssh@gmail.com