The Effect of Inquiry Model and Cognitive Style on Understanding of The Concept of Integrated IPS Course Students of Unila History Education Program
(1) * Myristica Imanita Mail (Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, FKIP, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia)
(2) Yustina Sri Ekwandari Mail (Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, FKIP, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia)
(3) Suparman Arif Mail (Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, FKIP, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


IPS Terpadu is a combination of several social sciences, one of which is story, but the students of fkip unila history still have difficulty understanding the concept IPS Terpadu so his study aimed to determine the effect of inquiry instructional model and cognitive   style towards the understanding students concepts in IPS Terpadu subjects. The research is quantitative research using design treatment by level 2x2 The research date was taken from observation,test and questionnaires. The results show that (1) there is differences in the level of understanding of the concepts of students who follow the inquiry instructional model and students who follow the conventional instructional model (2) there is interaction effect between instructional model and cognitive style towards the understanding students concepts in IPS Tepadu subjects (3) the results of understanding the concepts of students in IPS Terpadu subjects who follow inquiri instructional model with Field Independent cognitive style is hinger than students who follow conventional instructional model with field indenpendent cognitive style. (4)the risults of underdtanding students of concepts in IPS Terpadu subjects who follow inquiri instructional model with field dependent cognitive style is lower than students who follow conventional instructional model with field dependent cognitive style


Keywords


Inquiri instructional model; cognitive style; Understanding students’ concepts; IPS Terpadu

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v1i1.5 		      

Article metrics

10.47679/jrssh.v1i1.5 Abstract views : 134 | PDF views : 106

   

Cite

How to cite item
   

Full Text

Download

References


Altun, A., and Cakan, M., Undergraduate Student’s Academic Achivement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitif Syle and Attitude Toward computers.2006, www.ifets.into/journals/91/23.pdf

Anita E Woolfolk.1993. Educational Psychology, London: Allyn and Bacon Anne Anastasi and Susana Urbina, International Edition Seventh Edition Psychologycal Testing, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997

Arends, Richard I. 2012. Learning To Teach 9th Ed. New York: McGraww-Hill

Bropy, Jere, 2004.Motivating Students to Learn. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates

Depdiknas RI, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional RI, 2006

DePorter & Hernacki. 2000. Quantum Learning. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Kaifa.

Guisande, Adelina et.al. Fielad Dependence-udependence (FDIi cognitive style: an analysis of attention Fungchioning, journal. 2007 Vol 19. Psicothema online, hpps://www.psicothema.com./pdf339.pdf

Hamruni. 2012. Strategi Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta, Insan Madani

James W. Keefe. 1987. Learning Style Theory and Practice, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals

Makmun, 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan, Bandung: Rosda Karya Remaja.

Nawawi, H. 2007. Metode Penelitian di Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Nurhadi dan Senduk. 2003. Pembelajaran Konstektual dan Penerapannya dalam KBM. Malang. UMPRESS

Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.). Instructional Design Theories and Models: a New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbauw Associates Publishers, 1983.

Reta. 2012. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Artikel Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Sapriya. 2017. “Pendidikan IPS Konsep dan Pembelajaranâ€. Jakrta: Rosda

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode penelitian Pendidikan, pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta,

Sutarno. Kategori Pemahaman Konsep. 2012 (http://fisika21.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/kategori-pemahaman-konsep/ 5 April 2018)

Thomas K. Crowl, Sally Kominsky, and David M. Podell, Educational Psychology: Windows teaching, (Madison: Bron and Benchmork Publisher, 2007, )., p.99

Trianto. 2011. Modelâ€model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

W. Gulo. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: P.T. Grasindo.

Widianingsih, Dedeh. 2010. Perencanaan Pembelajaran, Bandung: Rizqi Press,

Witkhin A.H.1977. Field Dependent and Independent Cognitive Style and The Educational Implication. Review of Educational Research


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Myristica Imanita1; Yustina Sri Ekwandari; Suparman Arif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Journal of Research in Social Science And Humanities

Published by Utan Kayu Publishing

Lucky Arya Residence 2 No. 18
Jalan HOS. Cokroaminoto Kab. Pringsewu
Lampung - Indonesia, Postal code 35373

Email: info@jrssh.org | jurnal.jrssh@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
JRSSH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.